Evidence and disagreements regarding the tourist tax
Entry published in the Alde Blog Global Village Economy Blog – May Global Village Economy Blog, by Jordi Paniagua, on May 2, 2022 We are in year 2 after the pandemic and it seems that we should have learned something about evidence-based (empirical) public policies. Instead, we continue to observe heated discussions with unchangeable positions regarding public policies. For example, the debate on the tourist tax in the Valencian Community, where political parties, business organizations and neighborhood associations have dug trenches either for or against it.
Two online platforms have even been created
Exposing the arguments of both sides. Supporters ( here ) argue that it is a lie (sic) that the tourist tax negatively affects tourism. They argue that “the tourist tax will have no effect on the sector and will contribute to financing Denmark WhatsApp Data public services. Has contributed to amplifying media interest. However, there is an absent voice in the debate on the tourist tax. You will find practically no reference in the media to the more than 3,600 articles that appear in Google Scholar on the term “ tourist tax ”. (You can see a summary of the coverage in the local press here ). The First, the little popularity that evidence-based public policies have.
In some ways, we have become accustomed
The political game of black and white. Furthermore, the absence of references or opinions from those who study these issues is surprising. And this is precisely Tunisia WhatsApp Number List the second worrying issue: the difficulty with which they transfer research results outside the university environment. Many academics have been studying the effects of the tourist tax for decades. Specifically since the late their business. Today the motivations for imposing a tourist tax or a small payment per night are different. The objective is to correct the negative externalities associated with tourism. These occur when its costs are not assumed by the agents involved.